#RealWorldCoastToCoast

The Internet provides most of us excellent access to continued learning in many fields. This learning comes in the form of shared experiences, dedicated training and opportunities for us to learn by doing. Pilots are students for life and the pursuit of safety and proficiency is an unending goal for pilots.

Recently, #PilotEdge founder Keith published videos that journaled his trip from the East Coast to the West Coast. The video set is titled – #RealWorldCoastToCoast and is available from #PilotWorkshops. The video describes Keith’s journey from New Jersey to Los Angeles in an experimental Lancair aircraft. Keith flies the entire distance alone, captures the entire journey on video by wearing multiple cameras on himself. The videos are broken in segments each mirroring one leg of his flight. For each flight leg, Keith provides a dedicated video segment that describes his pre-flight flight planning activity. Similarly, he also provides another video segment where he debriefs the flown segment.

I found the videos to be extraordinarily valuable and here are the different reasons why.

  1. Not very often does one get to see such a milestone journey be completed by a single pilot in a single-engine plane.
  2. Not often is such a journey journaled in this level of detail.
  3. It is extremely valuable to see the journey journaled in video, minute by minute and without being paraphrased.

Secondly, it is immensely valuable to see it happen live. Especially when you get to observe all the thinking that goes into flight planning and then observe how often many of those assumptions come undone while en-route. Having the tenacity to deal with those in real-time is absolutely critical and the videos clearly demonstrate that. A few examples follow…

Keith has poor radio comms early on in his journey. The issues it poses in congested airspace and his approach to mitigating risk is learning. At another point, he finds out that the runway at one of his selected airports is shorter than anticipated due to construction. To complicate matters, this is at a high elevation airport which means longer takeoff roll as it is. The quick analysis, math and his approach to determining his airplanes performance at that airport is a quality lesson on how one can be called upon to improvise on the fly. Keith speaks about the importance of good pilotage, dead reckoning skills. He constants looks for landing options and ensures his situational awareness. With the growth of GPS devices, and more recently the iPad as an EFB, native pilotage has been taking a back seat. There is an increasing dependance on electronic devices in flight. There is no doubt that they make for better situational guidance. However, they can also serve as distractions. There are many stories about pilots who are pre-occupied with, and heads-down in, their electronic devices rather than being alert and looking outside. Although Keith uses the iPad extensively for his journey, you never find Keith heads-down in it for any enduring period of time. There is also the risk of these electronics failing leaving the pilot with few choices other than going back to basic principles of VFR flight. There is more than occasion when he is faced with electronics failure for simple reasons such as overheating of the device from prolonged use. Cross-referencing techniques are practiced and demonstrated all through the journey. At one high altitude airport, Keith is faced with tuning the automated weather frequency only to find that it is out of service. He overflies the field and finds no windsock either. He decides to use groundspeed to determine which way the winds are flowing around the field. Another lesson! His arrival into KLAX is masterfully completed.

These are but a few of those lessons. The video series is filled with them.

Third, the debrief sessions where Keith describes what went wrong or where something could have been done better provide important lessons.

Experience is a great teacher, however, it isn’t always possible to experience everything yourself. Learning from being a part of someone’s experience is next best available tool. Reading was the traditional method. Audio brought it to life, but seeing it in video form and living through that journey.. flight by flight, segment by segment… is a very valuable model for learning.

I would recommend the product to anyone pursuing the goal of being a safer pilot…

Note: I purchased the product and I wrote this review to describe why I found the product valuable. I have not been paid to provide a review.

CPJ

#FSX and #Win10 update

I deferred updating my primary PC on my simulator till the very last minute because I was very apprehensive about breaking something that as working really well. Of course, the last week of July came by soon and the deadline for Win 10 upgrade came up. With a ton of trepidation I finally hit the upgrade button!

After the upgrade was complete, I hesitantly turned all of the components of my sim. Surprisingly at first, everything seems to be working as before. That was not the case, though.

here are some of the fixes i had to go through and I am listing them below in case you have the similar issues.

FDS MCP G1 – Driver needed reinstall. Prosim needed to be configured again to use the correct COM port.

NVIDIA Settings – My PC lost all of its #FSX profile related #NVIDIA customizations. If you have a backup of the profile, you may be able to import it back.

FSX.CFG – Win10 registered NVIDIA #GTX card as a new entry in the FSX.CFG file. With that, FSX when started didn’t use the prior resolution, filtering and aliasing settings. I had to reset each of these settings to prior settings.

#UltimateTraffic2 – #UT2 would not start. It would ask for registration. When attempted to register, UT2 would come up with an “Invalid License File” notification. This is related to Windows Defender. Defender quarantines the license key file. Open Windows Defender and restore the Ultimate Traffic key file. Once this is complete, UT2 will run correctly. This short YouTube Video helped me resolve this issue.

With these changes, my simulator seems to be running normally. I did not need any changes to #ProSim737, #Aerosoft scenery or any other hardware drivers (which I have many of!).

Hope this helps.

CPJ

Garmin’s Fenix 3 Altimeter, Barometer

Garmin has some distinct products. Their sport, fitness and aviator wearables are one of them. Many of their wearables have an altimeter, barometer and compass – and are commonly known as an ABC watch. I can’t resist the opportunity to try, test and use instruments and gauges. I went and out and got the D2 Bravo – an aviators watch. The D2 Bravo was in essence a Fenix3 modified with a new software platform and functionality meant specifically for aviation. An example of an aviation feature was the inclusion of an airport database. Another was the configuration of two right-side buttons to be the ‘Direct To’  and ‘Nearest’ buttons. The D2 Bravo didn’t stay with me for very long. Suffice it to say that I had to replace the D2 Bravo four times for various reasons which are beyond the scope of this post

After waiting a few days, I got the Fenix3 hoping that without the added aviation features, the Fenix3 by itself would work just fine for sport and fitness use and then the Fenix too had an altimeter, barometer and a compass built-in – the 3 things I was looking for. It also had built-in GPS.

I have always been an avid student of the variability of atmospheric pressure with altitude (as also temperature with altitude). Of course, it is imperative that aviators at any/all levels understand such variability really well. Not doing so can lead to serious trouble. The above relationships are simple and complicated at the same time.

The Fenix3 brought with it a period of use and study of the watch and the curiosity to figure out how it works or why it behaves a certain way. In particular it was the altimeter and barometer that were built into it. Part of it was the continuation of my interest in altimetry. For the sake of providing some context, here is what was happening. The altimeter would drift over time even if the watch and person wearing it would be in one place. As a means of calibration, the watch allows for calibrating altitude by inputting known elevation. but it does not allow us to use sea-level adjusted pressure as a means of calibration. This means that in order to use the watch for measuring elevation (also known as true altitude), the only way to do so is to know the elevation of a location and use that number to calibrate the Fenix3. If you observe closely, once you enter the elevation, the indicated sea-level adjusted pressure number in the pressure widget will change (expected, of course).  As to why the Fenix3 was not designed to accept a sea-level corrected pressure number for calibration as the other option (say as published by the weather website or the local airport reading) baffles me. I have tried reading up but i have not found an answer.

In simple terms, there are 3 variables in this equation – Ambient Pressure, Elevation and Sea Level Adjusted Pressure.

Ambient Pressure +(-) Adjustment for Elevation = Sea Level Adjusted Pressure.

As can be seen above, one impacts the other two. Knowing two, we can find the third variable. Hence I cant figure out why Garmin decided to leave out the ability to set sea-level adjusted pressure as a calibration option.

There is a ton of material written in various forums varying from questions, answers, opinions, demands and rants around this topic – and there maybe no need for one more addition from me! I couldn’t resist writing up my view on this.

Lets for the time-being ignore that the watch (or the individual) has a GPS or any other device to measure altitude. The only device we have is this watch and the altimeter on it.

The first thing to note is that an altimeter will indicate some altitude at all times – the correctness of that indication is something we will come to further down in this post. Stated simply, the commonly found altimeter is actually a barometer that senses pressure. It’s just that the dial on an altimeter is calibrated to indicate altitude. The barometer senses ambient pressure (local pressure) at that location.

How does it then know what the altitude is?  Well, we know that pressure is 29.92 inHg at sea level. We also know that pressure decreases with increasing elevation – approximately 1 inHg per 1000 ft of elevation. Then it becomes easy to infer that if the ambient pressure at my location read 28.92 inHg, I must be at a 1000 ft of elevation above sea level. Easy?

That MAY BE correct. That is NOT ALWAYS correct. Why?  Because while on a standard day the above rule of pressure reduction may hold, there is hardly a standard day and even if there was, they are far and few. For one reason or the other things go non-standard very quickly. Imagine a storm moving through the area. What would happen to pressure in that situation? The pressure would begin drop. If you want to verify this, check out the surface weather charts for the US and compare it with the Doppler radar images (the ones that show green patches for rain, blue for ice etc). You will notice that the green patches will match up with the areas that have low pressure ‘L’ indicated on the surface charts. 

Lets go back to our example. We are at a location and pressure indicates 28.92. Ideally this should be a 1000 ft elevation. Will it always be so – NO. That’s the first thing to note and understand.

Then what is the actual elevation – also referred to as “true altitude” of that location? We will not know unless we can calibrate the altimeter in one of  two ways – a) local pressure adjusted to sea level OR (b) definite elevation of that location (as measured or surveyed). There is a 3rd option – GPS – but we already said earlier in this post that we are leaving that one out

Lets discuss the options above.

(a) – Local Pressure Adjusted to Sea Level

This number essentially is the pressure the location would be at if located at sea-level. This method of normalizing pressure at any geographic location (regardless of altitude) serves as a means of using the number for comparative purposes. To make this point clearer, imagine a location at sea level. Say the pressure at this point is standard – i.e. 29.92. Think of boarding an elevator at that exact location and going up a 1000 ft. On a standard day, the pressure at 1000 ft should be 28.92 (remember the thumb rule provided above – 1 inch drop per 1000 ft). While the ambient pressure at 1000 ft is 28.92, the sea level corrected pressure at that location will still be referred to as 29.92. This is very important to understand. Even if you went up another 1000 ft and the ambient pressure measured 27.82 (another inch less for the 1000 ft), the sea level corrected pressure at that point will still be 29.92. This is the reason that aircrafts arriving into an airport terminal area are provided the sea level corrected pressure (even if they are flying at that time at 10,000 ft). Pilots use that number to calibrate their altimeter (which is in fact a barometer) and thereafter they can rely on the indicated readings from that altimeter. Similarly, we could this option to calibrate any altimeter.

What happens if we are unable to know sea level corrected pressure for a certain area? We could use the other option.

(b) – Use known elevation of that location to calibrate the altimeter.

What is known elevation of a location? – Land surveys, topographic maps provide surveyed altitude of various locations. This is even more prevalent in areas where terrain is uneven. For example, while climbing up alpine mountains like Pilatus or Jungfrau, you will notice elevation marked at regular intervals. We could use these numbers to calibrate an altimeter.

If we don’t have either (a) or (b), then we indeed cannot calibrate our altimeter. This does not mean that we can’t use the altimeter. All we have lost at this point is the ability to determine our true altitude (elevation) from sea level. The altimeter is still useful in that it can be used to measure ascent or descent – in other words, to determine how many feet we have climbed or descended. How does this work? Remember an altimeter is a barometer that senses pressure. Regardless of whether we have been able to calibrate the altimeter to reflect true elevation, it is still sensing ambient pressure. If we climb from one point to another, it will detect a pressure change (a drop in this case) and by virtue of that drop, it will reflect a change in altitude (an increase in this case). Likewise, if we descended, the opposite cases would apply.

What does this mean? It means that if we are unable to calibrate our altimeter, we have lost the ability to measure our elevation (true altitude or height above sea level). However we are still able to measure altitude changes.

Given all of the above, the Fenix3 altimeter works exactly as expected.  There are several individuals with this question and this post is to provide my understanding on how the Fenix3 altimeter works. In summary, Fenix3 faithfully records altitude changes caused by climbing or descending. If calibrated manually (or via GPS), it indicates those changes in terms of elevation. It sets sea-level pressure correctly when provided a known elevation.

Note that I am not providing any view on the accuracy of the Fenix altimeter over varying usage. I have not been able to get to testing that accuracy.

Note also that in the above discussion, I have stayed away from the topic of how the watch behaves when ambient pressure is varying simultaneously with change in altitude. That’s for a different post.

CP Jois

#OSH16

#OSH16 was perhaps one of the best #AirVenture I have been to over the past two decades. Airplanes plenty, everywhere! No wonder its known to be the largest air show. For that one week, #KOSH traffic control turns into the busiest of any tower around the globe. As usual the camp grounds were filled with enthusiastic visitors.

Noteworthy at this year’s #OSH16 was the strong presence of #simulation technology. The #EAA Pilot Proficiency center housed 25+ simulators. Over the past decade, slowly but surely simulators and simulation products have strengthened their presence at #AirVenture. But this year was different. There were multiple scenarios that visitors could sign up for. Many of these scenarios were provisioned on #PilotEdge, Keith Smith’s ATC simulation network. Once signed up, they had read and understand the scenario, review the associated charts and prepare for the session. Upon getting their turn, they would get 30 mins to complete the procedure with an instructor.

Despite owning a sim, I couldn’t pass up an opportunity to fly a sim. I waited for a light rush morning on Sunday and flew an IFR minimums scenario with an instructor. Reviewing the scenario and prepping for the flight was a good experience.

Vintage Hangar and Light Aircrafts were very interesting. It was also Boeing’s centenary. The #Boeing pavilion was filled with Boeing history, current and future. The Boeing tent had a #787 simulator inside. Got to fly a Boeing field approach on the sim.

 

As evening fell, the scene shifted to twilight and anticipation around the upcoming evening air-show.

 

The night show on Saturday was a splendid experience. Aerobatics during the day is a marvel in itself. I can never fathom how they accomplish them in the dark.

Sunday was departure day for many. I got to the field very early Sunday morning. I am fascinated by a quiet morning at an airfield. The sun was just coming up and the morning glow falling through the #EAA Arch was a great sight to watch.

I sat by the EAA Arch watching many early morning departures. The #Ford #TriMotor was doing takeoffs and landings. There were a few #Piper Cubs doing the same. Seeing them fly, one cant help but wonder. On one hand, powered controlled flight is over a 100 years old, yet it feels like it began yesterday. On the other, across #AirVenture there was so much innovation on display evidence of the enormous progress aviation has made over that period.

An airplane flying overhead never ceases to amaze me…

Virtual Reality & the Oculus Rift

Its here… the new standard for Virtual Reality. The #OculusRift is finally ready for use and deliveries have been announced for Q1 2016. Virtual Reality has looked for traction for many years. The Rift will change everything we have known till date about #VR. As a simulator hobbyist who has spent years trying triple monitors, triple channel projection, FOV calculations I can clearly see – no pun intended – the value of the Rift. In the mad pursuit of achieving high resolution immersive 210 degree wrap-around views I had at one point 9 monitors dedicated to such wrap around view generation – and yet, the views would still feel like you were watching a monitor.

The Rift changes all that. Watch one of the videos I found on Youtube, you will see what I am talking about.

CP Jois